Many workers tried to study the evolution of worship in human race, like Frazer, Rendell Harris, Fowler etc., and they had documented the nature and types of tree /plant worship in many primitive as well the modern societies. They have documented how among the ancient Greeks and Romans the oak, the apple the laurel, the mistelote etc. became symbols of their gods and goddesses. It was the tree worship that gradually evolved into the polytheistic form of worship. John Stewart Collis in his book The Triumph of Tree writes (and I quote):
‘Today the tree is the body, tomorrow the abode of a spirit- animism turns into polytheism. Thus we see the wild Huntsman of North America known as Heno, riding the clouds and splitting the forest trees with his thunderbolt; and then we see him later, gathering the clouds together and pouring down warm rains- as a god of agriculture. Many simple spirits developed into a general spirit of vegetation, and often enough in the primitive mind several misconceptions existed at the same time …’. Let me quote a passage from Frazer’s famous book ‘The Golden Bough’:
‘When a tree comes to be viewed, no longer as the body of the tree-spirit, but simply as its abode which it can quit at pleasure, an important advance has been made in religious thought. Animism is passing into polytheism. In other words, instead of regarding each tree as a living and conscious being, man now sees in it merely a lifeless, inert mass, tenanted for a longer or shorter time by a supernatural being who, as he can pass freely from tree to tree, thereby enjoys a certain right of possession or lordship over the trees, and, ceasing to be a tree-soul, becomes a forest god. As soon as the tree-spirit is thus in a measure disengaged from each particular tree, he begins to change his shape and assume the body of a man, in virtue of a general tendency of early thought to clothe all abstract spiritual beings in concrete human form. Hence in classical art the sylvan deities are depicted in human shape, their woodland character being denoted by a branch or some equally obvious symbol. But this change of shape does not affect the essential character of the tree-spirit. The powers which he exercised as a tree-soul incorporate in a tree, he still continues to wield as a god of trees. This I shall now attempt to prove in detail. I shall show, first, that trees considered as animate beings are credited with the power of making the rain to fall, the sun to shine, flocks and herds to multiply, and women to bring forth easily; and, second, that the very same powers are attributed to tree-gods conceived as anthropomorphic beings or as actually incarnate in living men.’
Frazer cites examples from across the continets and socities to show this evolution of tree worship from the primitive nature worship to polytheistic form and the tree gods evolved from the form a tree to that of a stylised human male or female form. Frazer writes:
‘Again, the tree-spirit makes the herds to multiply and blesses women with offspring. In
In the Tuhoe tribe of Maoris the power of making women fruitful is ascribed to trees. These trees are associated with the navel-strings of definite mythical ancestors, as indeed the navel-strings of all children used to be hung upon them down to quite recent times. A barren woman had to embrace such a tree with her arms, and she received a male or a female child according as she embraced the east or the west side. The common European custom of placing a green bush on May Day before or on the house of a beloved maiden probably originated in the belief of the fertilising power of the tree-spirit. In some parts of
From PN Ravindran's forthcoming book :Nandanom- the Garden of Gods.
Great effort in unlocking the mystery of how and why some plants became sacred. The narration in the form of discourse makes the reading easy and interesting. Hope to see the book in print soon. Best wishes!!
ReplyDelete